GMR Transcription
Physical Address: not verified
𝐏𝐡𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐀𝐝𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬: not verified
GMR Transcription is a California transcription company providing human transcription services commonly used for interviews, academic research, and business recordings.
𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐭𝐬 𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐝:
Human transcription
General, academic, and business use cases
Emphasis on accuracy and confidentiality in public marketing
𝐖𝐞𝐛𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞: https://www.gmrtranscription.com/
𝐇𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐝𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐲𝐩𝐞:
𝐏𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐝𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬: 2552 Walnut Ave. Suite 100, Tustin, CA 92780.
𝐀𝐝𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐲𝐩𝐞: Published multi-tenant suite (not street-verified)
GMR publishes 2552 Walnut Ave. Suite 100, Tustin, CA 92780 (Tustin Corporate Center). That building is a real multi-tenant commercial plaza with other businesses, and California filings / a 2020 PR use the suite. Street View and the facade show no GMR signage, so Brocato does not treat it as a verified physical address. It is not a Delaware registered-agent mill, but it also is not confirmed as a branded staffed HQ from the street.
𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞:
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐫: counts below are LinkedIn or LeadIQ people associated with the company. Marketplace and transcription firms often mix freelance/contract transcribers with staff. These figures are not a single-office headcount.
LinkedIn shows roughly ~99 people associated with the company. The workforce signal is US-concentrated, with smaller counts also reported in Argentina, Mexico, Canada, and India. Exact non-US country headcounts are not stated here because this directory entry does not invent numbers beyond the sourced totals.
𝐒𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞: LinkedIn company page for GMR Transcription (~99 people).
𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬:
𝐅𝐓𝐂 𝐌𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝟏𝟐𝟐-𝟑𝟎𝟗𝟓 — 𝐆𝐌𝐑 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐒𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐬, 𝐈𝐧𝐜.: Official FTC case docket page for Part 2 consent proceeding against GMR Transcription Services, Inc., Ajay Prasad, and Shreekant Srivastava. File/Matter 122 3095. Primary source: https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/122-3095-gmr-transcription-services-inc-matter. Case timeline includes August 21, 2014 Decision and Order and related complaint/analysis documents.
𝐅𝐓𝐂 𝐃𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐎𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫 — 𝐃𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐭 𝐂-𝟒𝟒𝟖𝟐: Official FTC Decision and Order PDF. Caption: In the Matter of GMR TRANSCRIPTION SERVICES, INC. et al., DOCKET NO. C-4482; file 122 3095. Primary source: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/140821gmrdo.pdf. Consent order arising from alleged inadequate data-security practices; primary-source regulatory action (not a certification).
𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦𝐬 (𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐝):
𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐇𝐈𝐏𝐀𝐀 / 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠: https://www.gmrtranscription.com/ — Company site marketing around confidentiality/HIPAA; not independently verified via auditor report in this pass. Not on CBI CJIS Vendor Directory.
𝐂𝐁𝐈 𝐂𝐉𝐈𝐒 𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐨𝐫 𝐃𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤 (𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔-𝟎𝟗-𝟏𝟏): this company does not appear among the ~619 names on Colorado’s published CBI CJIS Vendor Management Program list. CBI also states that directory listing is not itself a guarantee of full CJIS compliance.
𝐂𝐉𝐈𝐒 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐩𝐭𝐬
Not CJIS unless production is strictly U.S. personnel.
GMR publicly claims 100% U.S.-based transcriptionists. LinkedIn-associated people also include Argentina, Mexico, Canada, and India. A foreign contractor cannot handle CJI under FBI CJIS Security Policy (personnel must be U.S.-based and background-checked for criminal justice information). This directory entry does not invent or confirm a CJIS certificate for GMR.
𝐂𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐭-𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐩𝐭𝐬: typically no unless a U.S.-based process is confirmed.
𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐨𝐧: an overseas transcriber is not available to appear in a U.S. court to authenticate the transcript, so companies with foreign-associated production typically do not certify transcripts for U.S. court use. Confirm with GMR whether any given job is produced only by U.S. personnel before treating it as court-oriented.
𝐑𝐞𝐩𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧:
Longstanding US transcription vendor. On the regulatory side: FTC Matter 122-3095 / Docket C-4482 (2014) imposed a 20-year data-security consent order after medical transcripts were exposed online; the order runs through August 14, 2034. This is an FTC matter, not FCC. Customers handling PHI should review current security practices and the consent-order context.
𝐄𝐱𝐭𝐫𝐚 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐬:
https://www.gmrtranscription.com/
FTC Matter 122-3095 / Docket C-4482 (2014 data-security consent order)
𝐁𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐨 𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐞: confirm HIPAA/security paperwork and current practices before sending medical audio.