GMR Transcription

𝐏𝐡𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐀𝐝𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬: not verified
GMR Transcription is a California transcription company providing human transcription services commonly used for interviews, academic research, and business recordings.

Human transcription
General, academic, and business use cases
Emphasis on accuracy and confidentiality in public marketing

𝐖𝐞𝐛𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞: https://www.gmrtranscription.com/

𝐇𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐝𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐲𝐩𝐞
𝐏𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐝𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬: 2552 Walnut Ave. Suite 100, Tustin, CA 92780.
𝐀𝐝𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐲𝐩𝐞: Published multi-tenant suite (not street-verified)
GMR publishes 2552 Walnut Ave. Suite 100, Tustin, CA 92780 (Tustin Corporate Center). That building is a real multi-tenant commercial plaza with other businesses, and California filings / a 2020 PR use the suite. Street View and the facade show no GMR signage, so Brocato does not treat it as a verified physical address. It is not a Delaware registered-agent mill, but it also is not confirmed as a branded staffed HQ from the street.

𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞 (𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐲)
Disclaimer: counts below are LinkedIn or LeadIQ people associated with the company. Marketplace and transcription firms often mix freelance/contract transcribers with staff. These figures are not a single-office headcount.
LinkedIn shows roughly ~99 people associated with the company. The workforce signal is US-concentrated, with smaller counts also reported in Argentina, Mexico, Canada, and India. Exact non-US country headcounts are not stated here because this directory entry does not invent numbers beyond the sourced totals.
Source: LinkedIn company page for GMR Transcription (~99 people).

𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬

FTC Matter 122-3095 — GMR Transcription Services, Inc.: Official FTC case docket page for Part 2 consent proceeding against GMR Transcription Services, Inc., Ajay Prasad, and Shreekant Srivastava. File/Matter 122 3095. Primary source: https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/122-3095-gmr-transcription-services-inc-matter. Case timeline includes August 21, 2014 Decision and Order and related complaint/analysis documents.
FTC Decision and Order — Docket C-4482: Official FTC Decision and Order PDF. Caption: In the Matter of GMR TRANSCRIPTION SERVICES, INC. et al., DOCKET NO. C-4482; file 122 3095. Primary source: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/140821gmrdo.pdf. Consent order arising from alleged inadequate data-security practices; primary-source regulatory action (not a certification).

Company claims (not independently verified):

Company HIPAA / security marketing: https://www.gmrtranscription.com/ — Company site marketing around confidentiality/HIPAA; not independently verified via auditor report in this pass. Not on CBI CJIS Vendor Directory.

CBI CJIS Vendor Directory check (2026-09-11): this company does not appear among the ~619 names on Colorado’s published CBI CJIS Vendor Management Program list. CBI also states that directory listing is not itself a guarantee of full CJIS compliance.
𝐂𝐉𝐈𝐒 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐩𝐭𝐬
Not CJIS unless production is strictly U.S. personnel.
GMR publicly claims 100% U.S.-based transcriptionists. LinkedIn-associated people also include Argentina, Mexico, Canada, and India. A foreign contractor cannot handle CJI under FBI CJIS Security Policy (personnel must be U.S.-based and background-checked for criminal justice information). This directory entry does not invent or confirm a CJIS certificate for GMR.
Court-certifiable transcripts: typically no unless a U.S.-based process is confirmed.
Reason: an overseas transcriber is not available to appear in a U.S. court to authenticate the transcript, so companies with foreign-associated production typically do not certify transcripts for U.S. court use. Confirm with GMR whether any given job is produced only by U.S. personnel before treating it as court-oriented.

𝐑𝐞𝐩𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
Longstanding US transcription vendor. On the regulatory side: FTC Matter 122-3095 / Docket C-4482 (2014) imposed a 20-year data-security consent order after medical transcripts were exposed online; the order runs through August 14, 2034. This is an FTC matter, not FCC. Customers handling PHI should review current security practices and the consent-order context.

𝐄𝐱𝐭𝐫𝐚 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐬

https://www.gmrtranscription.com/
FTC Matter 122-3095 / Docket C-4482 (2014 data-security consent order)

Brocato listing note: confirm HIPAA/security paperwork and current practices before sending medical audio.